In an ideal world, our campuses would grow steadily, budgets would be robust, and job security wouldn’t be something we have to worry about. But when budget deficits, enrollment shifts, or state funding cuts hit public higher education, the University of Maine System often looks at personnel costs to balance the ledger. For employees represented by the University of Maine Professional Staff Association (UMPSA), the immediate threat of layoffs sends everyone looking to union leadership for answers. It’s completely natural to ask, “What can our union actually do to protect us?” The reality is that while UMPSA has significant tools to shield members, its power exists within a specific legal sandbox defined by labor laws, the UMPSA Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA), and the university’s actual financial constraints.

When a budget crisis hits our campuses, UMPSA acts as an essential buffer, legal shield, and negotiating force. While the union might not always be able to halt structural cuts entirely, it has massive sway over how those cuts are handled. For starters, UMPSA can demand “effects bargaining.” Even if the administration exercises its right to eliminate positions to close a budget gap, they are legally required to sit down with UMPSA to negotiate the impact on staff. This is how the union fights for vital safety nets, such as severance pay, extensions of health insurance coverage, and proper payouts for accrued vacation or compensatory time.

Beyond that, the UMPSA contract is a legally binding shield. UMPSA leadership carefully monitors the administration to ensure they strictly follow the agreed-upon rules of the CBA. This means enforcing seniority rights—ensuring that newer hires are generally impacted before long-term, veteran professional staff—and protecting workers from being unfairly or arbitrarily targeted by management. Many higher education contracts also include “bumping rights,” which can allow a qualified senior staff member whose position is cut to transition into another role held by someone with less seniority, keeping experienced workers employed within the system.

Before any official pink slips go out, UMPSA can also present creative, cost-saving alternatives to the administration to save the budget without sacrificing people’s livelihoods. These community-minded solutions often include proposing temporary furloughs, voluntary early retirement incentives, or broad freezes on administrative overhead and outside consulting fees. If reductions are truly unavoidable, UMPSA works to secure robust recall rights. This means that if the university’s budget bounces back within a specific timeframe, UMS is contractually obligated to offer those positions back to laid-off UMPSA members before opening up applications to external candidates.

Crucially, our power as a union isn’t limited to what happens at the campus negotiating table. When the university faces structural shortfalls, we don’t have to just accept the scarcity—we can collectively organize to change the financial reality. Because UMPSA is proudly affiliated with the Maine Education Association (MEA) and the National Education Association (NEA), we belong to a massive statewide and national family. We can leverage the full weight of the MEA’s advocacy infrastructure, legal resources, and political influence to fight back. Together, we can take our message straight to Augusta, mobilizing members to lobby state legislators and the Governor to secure emergency funding, protect public higher education, and address system-wide funding shortfalls before they trigger job losses.

On the flip side, navigating a budget crisis with clear eyes means understanding the boundaries of union power. UMPSA consists of dedicated staff members, not university trustees or executives; they don’t control the ultimate allocation of existing state funds or tuition revenue, meaning they cannot unilaterally block layoffs. If the University of Maine System can prove a genuine economic necessity and sticks to the letter of the CBA, a union grievance cannot simply cancel the job cuts. At the end of the day, a union cannot force an employer to spend money that literally isn’t there, nor can it legally compel the system to maintain staffing levels that would cause total financial insolvency.

When emotions run high and jobs are on the line, members often want to take drastic action, but UMPSA cannot violate the contract’s “no-strike” clause. Like most collective bargaining agreements, the UMPSA contract includes a promise not to strike or walk out while the agreement is active. Striking over budget layoffs during a contract period is considered an illegal work stoppage, which could unfortunately leave participating employees vulnerable to immediate termination without union protection. Finally, UMPSA cannot rewrite the contract on the fly. The union must stick to the pre-negotiated layoff procedures already outlined in the current agreement, even if the strict application of those rules feels incredibly painful for certain departments or junior colleagues.

What UMPSA Can DoWhat UMPSA Cannot Do
Force UMS management to follow strict seniority and contract rulesForce the university to maintain positions it genuinely cannot afford
Bargain for severance packages, extended healthcare, and robust recall rightsCall for a strike or walkout during an active contract period
Propose alternatives like furloughs, retirement incentives, or overhead cutsDictate the broader internal financial allocation of the UMS budget
Partner with the MEA, state legislators, and the Governor to fight for fundingProtect a position if the layoff process complies completely with the contract

When budget crises threaten our campuses, UMPSA’s role shifts from standard advocacy to critical damage control and political mobilization. We may not have the power to fix a systemic university budget shortfall from the inside, but by acting collectively, we can influence the decision-makers in Augusta. By fiercely defending the contract, pushing for creative alternatives, and organizing for better state support, UMPSA provides a vital safety net and a powerful voice that non-unionized workers simply don’t have.